Why Prejudice Against White Canadians Must Be Added To “Anti-Racism” Initiatives

To post to facebook, click here:
“Donald Trump’s pledge to fight what he calls “anti-white feeling” in the U.S. will likely embolden allies who seek to dismantle government and corporate programs created to battle racism and boost diversity in American life.”
 
What else to expect from media other than repudiation of a “post-post modern” concept regarding race relations in western society? North of the 49th parallel, in Canada, not a word has been whispered in the mainstream press regarding the premise of adding “anti-white” sentiment to the pantheon of race-relations.
 
In this Canadians can witness the hypocrisy of “progressive” liberal politics. Forever espousing “equality” as an ultimate goal, PM Justin Trudeau and the Liberals refuse to entertain the idea of authentic “social equity.”
 
“Passed during a time when Black Americans campaigned aggressively for civil rights, the act prohibits hiring or compensation decisions based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”
“Hamilton, who served in the Justice Department under Trump, says the act should protect white people as well.”
 
A fascinating concept it is, one that will enter the consciousness of Canadian society on the 12th of Never. Government hate it, media loathe it, academic institutions brand it “racist.”
 
But what happens when Canada’s overall demography progressives into a social dynamic in which no identifiable community dominates society? Is this not the ostensible goal of our Liberal government’s “diversity” agenda.
 
CAP refuse to beat around the woke bush: Equality is in no manner the ultimate objective. Domination– now that’s another ballgame. Therefore, all propositions promoting anti-racism initiatives for Anglophone-Canadians will hit the dumpster faster than you can say “diversity is our strength.”
 
 “The Politics Of 2036, When Canada Is As Brown As It Is White”
 
“Opponents of Canada’s wide-open immigration policy have good reason to complain. This country embarked on a massive social experiment in the early 1990s, when the Mulroney government opened the immigration floodgates.”
 
“That experiment is radically altering the ethnic makeup of the population. Yet that decision was never properly debated. Has the time come for such a debate, or is it too late?”

 

Posited back in 2016, the question strikes at the heart of contemporary Canadian society. In this regard, one must understand the manner in which government and media control our social narrative.

Yes, the time has come for debate. No, our controlling institutions will never permit it. Based on government-media collusion, the same pattern will play out as it did with Multiculturalism. By the time general society figures out the policies detrimental impact on our “Old Stock” Canadian communities, it will be too late to do anything to rectify the situation.

It’s a set-up certain to play out within Canada’s Anglo-European communities. By 2040, or perhaps earlier, white citizens will transition to a minority community. If the Liberal Party of Canada has their way, whites will also exist as the singular identifiable minority community in which targeted prejudice is socially permissible.

For Cultural Action Party [est. 2016], it’s the true meaning of Trudeau’s proclamation of a “post-modern” society. Some thirty years down the woke road, when the structure is fully ingrained, Canadians may begin to comprehend “what went down.”

Either it’s equality, or it isn’t. Below the border in the United States, protection of white community rights is at least referenced within media narrative. In Canada? Forget about it– it will never happen, at least not until it is far too late.

Recent times a have seen a plethora of empowerment for Canada’s “racialized” communities. We stand witness as a Ugandan import Attorney General, MP Arif Virani, appoints a Muslim co-religionist from Uganda to head up the Canadian Human Rights Commission.  A major piece of community empowerment it is.

“I think there is a definite anti-white feeling in this country,” Trump told Time in a recent interview.
To say this doesn’t exist in Canada is pathetically laughable. After nearly ten years of our current Liberal government, the sentiment is ingrained in all our social institutions.
 
Trudeau condemns Canada for its colonial roots. New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh brands Canada genocidal. Media reflect the will of government. Academia thrash our communities on an ongoing basis with their DEI, CRT and BIOPIC agendas. Corporations maintain hiring procedures that exclude whites from being hired.
 
 Canada has become a nation of diasporas. Rather than wrapping ourselves in a common flag, we huddle in our enclaves: Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Jewish, Chinese, Black and the list goes on. Faith, color and country of origin divide the nation.
 
 Is this, in reality, the actual goal of government? Let us ponder this for a moment. Let’s say you wanted to revolutionize a society, transitioning it to something the citizens of a nation never asked for.
Which scenario would lead to success faster?  A united, cohesive pluralist society, or a divided, fragmented collection of communities. If you selected the latter, what source for social manipulation would you utilize?
 
The history of 20th century social revolutions tells the story. Chairman Mao Tse Tung in China, Stalin and Lenin in the Soviet Union, Fidel Castro’s Cuba, in addition to the advent of European fascism during World War 2.
 
In each case, a “demonized” ethnic or religious community was set-up to be the “fall-guy.” Could a similar dynamic exist at the heart of Justin Trudeau’s “Woke Revolution?”
 
In a society “dedicated to ethnic quality” as purported by our Liberal government, there exists one community which falls outside the spectrum of so-called “inclusiveness.”
 
Rendering the entire structure a lie. Without inclusiveness for Anglo-Europeans, the agenda is nothing less than systemic racism directed at a single identifiable community.

4 thoughts on “Why Prejudice Against White Canadians Must Be Added To “Anti-Racism” Initiatives”

  1. Unfortunately, it will require cracking open the horrendous Canadian constitution to remove subsection 2 of the ‘Equality Rights’.
    Can you imagine the screaming, squalling, hair-on-fire, footstomping fury from the bipocs if this was even suggested?

    Equality rights – section 15
    Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law
    15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

    Affirmative action programs

    (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

    Reply
  2. It is divide and conquer, or divide and control.
    The whole point of the cultural dilution and population replacement program deployed against Canada by the communist traitor Pierre Trudeau was to create conflict within the population. None of this was an experiment, it was and is a carefully thought out and executed military plan. Canada is now fifty years into the hundred year plan of the communist globalist anti-freedom anti-life scumbags. Christian culture is the only culture that is based on freedom, it is source of almost all invention and innovation in the world. And that is why it is under attack everywhere in the world. It is easy to get those who are jealous to destroy those they are jealous of. Once the christians have been erased, they can pretend they never were, and claim all of humanities gains as their own.

    Reply
  3. Some might argue reasonably at this point that Canada under this sociopathic narcissist-dictator’s so-called government

    is now well beyond the point of “debate”.

    Reply

Leave a Comment