Why Accusations Of Hate From LGBT Advocates Are Misplaced

To post to facebook, click here:

Each day that passes in the world of LGBT politics in Canada brings more of the same. Another Pride Parade, another “act of hate” against homosexuals and transgendered citizens, according to advocates.

To be sure, it’s a falsehood. But what else is to expected in the post-modern society that PM Justin Trudeau has cultivated since taking office in late 2015.

In “no core identity” Canada, the cult of victimhood has transitioned to the social order of the day. In terms of playing the “victim-card,” LGBT advocates are running away with the ball.

Hyper-sensitive as they are, every piece of pushback against Pride constitutes an “act of hate.” Beyond the community itself, what gets CAP’s goat is the manner in which this social dynamic is being portrayed by mainstream media.

Our press agree. A citizen tosses a can of black paint on a rainbow crosswalk in small town Canada. That’s a “hate crime,” say LGBT advocates, and media gladly comply.

“Facing Calls To Act, Canadian Lawmakers Note Rising Tide Of Hate And Violence Against LGBTQ2S+ Community’

“Marking the International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia, federal lawmakers are drawing attention to an increase in hate and violence directed at members of the LGBTQ2S+ community in Canada, while facing calls from advocates to act to address it.”

Upon which CAP point toward critical elements in the debate that have with full intention been omitted from media commentary:

— The extent of push-back against public LGBT and Transgender promotion is directly proportionate to the degree to which government, media and academia are pushing an unwanted condition upon society.

— The woke warriors of LGBT, as well as media, refuse to make a critical distinction. Those who oppose are not targeting homosexuality. Rather, concerned Canadians are focused on LGBT propaganda being aimed at children and youth.

In this we reach the core of the conflict, something that CBC and corporate media are loathe to do. By ignoring these factors, government-media exacerbate the conflict. Refusing to distinguish between adult homosexuality and transgender targeting of youth is essential to any reasonable debate on these topics.

Say no-go on that one. Just ask journalist Shree Paradkar from the Toronto Star, who writes:

“Muslim participation in protests against Pride has become a knotty issue involving religious beliefs, political expediency and in some quarters a flirtation with outright hate.”

Let us lay it on the line: Toronto Star is the leading Anglophone-bashing media outlet in Canada, and their journalist is a shining light of woke hatred of non-racialized Canadians.

On the topic of Muslim-Canadian push-back against LGBT indoctrination in our schools, we note the following:

Canadian Muslims Invite Everyone To Join ‘Million Person March’ Against LGBT Indoctrination In Schools’

“The September 22, 2023 protest is set to unite all religions in the defense of children against LGBT indoctrination in Canadian schools.” 

As published by Globe & Mail, along with Global News and CTV.

Not. It will be a balmy winters day in Nunavut when legacy media in Canada touch a topic such as this.

Why? The answer is found in a social development rendered taboo by our controlling institutions. Cultural Action Party[est. 2016] refer to this as “inter-community solidarity.”

Our Liberal government, and our prime minister in particular, hate this kind of thing. Pourquoi? Because it stands as an unprecedented example of unity among Christians, Muslims and various religious communities of Canada.

An affront to the “divide and conquer” strategy it is. After all, the history of social revolutions reveals a commonality among those who lead the charge.

Social division is key among all examples. Father of communism, Karl Marx, wrote so much in his Communist Manifesto. Mao Tse Tung employed as much, along with Joseph Stalin and other historical despots.

Crucial to success is division among a nation’s identifiable communities. For CAP, Justin Trudeau fits into the despotic ruler mode. If one cares to notice, his seven-plus year run as PM has done nothing to cultivate unity within Canada’s pluralist society.

LGBT? Heterosexual vs. Homosexual. Racism?  White against non-white. Abortion? Pro-life vs. pro-death. Euthanasia? Pro-life vs Pro-death. Religion? Christian against Muslim. Transgender? Parents vs Educators.

The list goes on. Let us branch out to simulate what would be an ideal statement from a national leader at a time when our fragmented society could use a bit of healing.

Hypothetical Statement From A Prime Minister:

“Government encourage citizens to unite as Canadians. White, Black, Asian, Gay– all are part of the national fabric, and as such, deserve to live with dignity within our pluralist society.”

Never. There isn’t a hope in Hades that PM Trudeau would deliver messaging along these lines. For cryin’ out loud– the man has been prime minister for nearly eight years, during which time he has not once made verbal reference to English Canada, or our Anglophone communities.

Conversely, let’s consider how many times Mr. Trudeau has publicly referenced Muslim-Canadians, Islam, Ramadan, “Islamophobia” and such.

Try 8,888,888 times, and keep on counting. Pray-tell, what kind of message does this deliver to citizens of our country?

The answer, of course, is no message at all– because mainstream media has not once alluded to any element of which we speak.

Conclusion: Justin Trudeau enjoys the chaos emanating from social conflicts such as that which LGBT dealers have brought to Canada’s social card game. Either this, or the man is simply following globalist orders from on-high.

Repeat: What anti-LGBT advocates want is to have the propaganda removed from the Canadian public school system. It’s a far cry from a “this is hate” motif emanating from Canada’s monolithically woke media.

Get the LGBT mess out of our schools, and the conflict will subside.

2 thoughts on “Why Accusations Of Hate From LGBT Advocates Are Misplaced”

  1. “This is hate.” Three cheap words; tossed about without any proof. The third one is a kill switch for any intelligent; reasonable debate. These tiny minorities have no interest in rational dialogue. It doesn’t serve their insatiable appetite for more control; more power; more payback to their “victimizers.” That sounds familiar….They all follow the tune of their leader, and prime instigator of this fracturing of our country. Victimhood is my game; Trudeau is my name.

  2. Those that control the language, win the argument.
    The alphabets will use the language and the laws as illustrated below to allow for their definition of ‘hate’ to be enshrined legally and since ‘hate’ is a feeling, they may shut down and punish anyone who dissents against them as they get to define what that ‘feeling’ of ‘hate’ is to them.
    The laws of Canada are now enshrined with the destructive idea through the granting of ‘supra-rights’ to the alphabets that it can be interpreted that any obstructive intent, any dissent, any opposition will be now argued that it is ‘hate’ and the law will remove this adversity which is those of you who oppose their politics.

    Marginal note: Public incitement of hatred
    319 (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
    (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
    (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
    Marginal note:Wilful promotion of hatred
    (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
    (a) an indisurectable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
    (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

    As well:

    Bill C-4 would amend the Criminal Code to prohibit certain activities that relate to “conversion therapy”, which is defined as a practice, treatment or service designed to: change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual; 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻’𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿; 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻’𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝘅 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝘁𝗵; 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝗿; 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻’𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆; 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻’𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝘅 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝘁𝗵. The definition also provides, for greater certainty, that conversion therapy does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates to the exploration or development of an integrated personal identity — such as a practice, treatment or service that relates to a person’s gender transition — and that is not based on an assumption that a particular sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression is to be preferred over another.


Leave a Comment