Is Trudeau About To Make Anti-Government Behaviour A Criminal Act?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is of the opinion that existing punitive legal measures for hate crimes are inadequate. Existing anti-hate laws include:

Canadian Human Rights Act(1985):

• 3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.

Canadian Criminal Code, Section 319(1):

Under section 319(1), everyone who, by communicating statements in a public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of an indictable offence punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment, or of a summary conviction offence.

Not good enough, intimates Justin Trudeau. A House of Commons committee report suggests that Canada should immediately put in place a strategy to fight “ideologically-motivated violent extremism.”

“The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) considers IMVE to have four sub-categories—“xenophobic, gender-driven, anti-authority and other personal grievance-driven violence,” the report outlines.

Do tell, fellow patriots. How does one define “anti-authority” behaviour? CAP will take a stab at it. How about…“behaviour by a Canadian citizen that is in any way critical of Liberal government policy.”

Talk about a wide berth for legal interpretation. Does actual violence have to take place? Or rather, is this an incremental step toward what George Orwell wrote of as “thought-crimes?”

“IMVE is a separate category from religiously-motivated and politically-motivated violent extremism, and according to a witness from Public Safety Canada was meant to eliminate terms like ‘far right’.”

Could criticism of government one day become a crime in Canada? It is in China– the source of so many of PM Trudeau’s moves toward replication of an authoritarian state.

The good news is the proposal has yet to transition to legislation. The bad news is that such an endeavour could constitute encroachment of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Not that media, academia, courts, judges and lawyers will have a problem with that. Within Canada’s legal industry, it’s one step short of vocational suicide to push-back against Liberal government woke ideology.

Critical to opening a door for punishment of citizens at will is what the committee refers to as “Ideologically-Motivated Violent Extremism.”

This is a slippery slope that could open doors for punitive damages toward innocent Canadians. Will it be acts of violence– or incitement of hatred– which seals the fate for  those objecting to government policy? For freedom-lovers, pangs of authoritarianism begin to pop-up. What’s happening to our country? Don’t look to media to deliver an answer– nothing will be forthcoming.

“What happened to the big push against radical Islamism, Sikh extremism or white supremacists? What was it that made House of Commons MPs flip their lids and come out with such a mean-spirited, anti-Canadian report calling for the heads of anyone who disagrees with Monkey Boy in the PMO?”

CAP have a go at this one: the motivation comes from an incremental agenda of neo-communist social seduction. Decades in the making, all systems are go as our citizenship lack vehicles to fight back against Trudeau’s neo-totalitarian agenda.

Is this Trudeau character harbouring a giant vendetta against our country? What is it about Canada that causes our PM to display such hostility towards national identity? Is it so extreme as to be pathological in nature?

All Trudeau wants from Canadians is to put up, shut up, and comply with every draconian government directive thrown in our faces. It’s far more Fidel Castro than Pierre Trudeau, although both were communists like Justin. Perhaps blood is thicker than water. CAP has difficulty envisioning how our neo-communist condition could occur without Justin Trudeau steering the woke ship toward its destination.

During the era of Chairman Mao and the Cultural Revolution,Chinese courts were utilized for persecution of those who challenged the authorities. Jail terms or capital punishment were imposed on enemies of government.

In China, inciting subversion of state power” carries a lengthy jail term. A charge of “provoking trouble” has  been frequently used to detain human rights activists.  

Memories of Trucker Convoys in Ottawa?

Winston Churchill once said, “a state of society where men may not speak their minds cannot long endure.”

Thank goodness for that. At least it offers a glimmer of hope that Justin Trudeau’s neo-communist Canada has a limited lifespan.

A crime to criticize the prime minister? CAP wouldn’t count it out. It is, after all, foundational within the communist societies Justin Trudeau most admires.