Is Sexual Degeneracy A Core Liberal Value?

Degenerate, adjective:

“Having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.”

Coinciding with Pride Month in 2016, PM Justin Trudeau told a homosexual news agency his government would be lowering the age of consent for anal sex from 18 to 16 years of age.

Bill C-75 repeals a section of Section 159 of the Criminal Code. The legislation removes “a longstanding point of discrimination against gay men by eliminating the unequal age of consent for anal sex in Canada.” 

According to Lifesite News, the question came up at the tail-end of a video interview Trudeau gave to Daily Xtra on the eve of his participation in a Gay Pride Parade in Toronto.

“Trudeau managed a terse one-sentence response when asked about addressing the two-year discrepancy between the two ages of consent. That’s something we very much look forward to moving on in short order.”

The Liberal government’s anal sex reformation legislation was approved by Parliament in June, 2019. Such are the priorities for Canada’s federal government. One would think that with all the consternation in Canadian society, Justin Trudeau would have more pressing issues to deal with.

He doesn’t. For what reason would our federal government create a bill for this purpose?

The Feds motive for the legislation has never been explored, for good reason. Mainstream media in Canada never took the time to drill into reasons why. CAP can only speculate as to government motivation.

In retrospect, clear-thinking Canadians may recognize this event as a starting point for what has followed. Those of us who pride themselves on common sense can see what transpired in the wake of the Trudeau government’s obsession with lowering the consent for anal sex from 18 years to a 16-year old  minimum age requirement.

Justin Trudeau establishes an unprecedented “Minister of LGBT” position, initially populated by Liberal MP Randy Boissonnault. What followed was  a comprehensive political push to advance Canada’s LGBT communities to the forefront of Canadian society.

It didn’t take long before contention entered the body politic. The LGBT push contained a vital sub-plot: transgenderism, and in particular, “gender dysphoria” advancement in Canada’s public school system.

It took a while, but Canadian parents eventually began to become aware of what was being taught to their children in class. Upon which we present the following microcosm:

The story of Adam and Eve transitions to the story of “Adam and Steve.”

“Lord’s Prayer Banned 25 Years Ago After Sudbury Protest”

CBC News, September 2, 2013— “A Jew, Muslim and a non-believer filed a lawsuit in 1985 under the Charter of Rights.”

They won the case. A core component of the Christian faith is banned within Canada’s public school system, based on Charter Rights. Move ahead four decades and witness as transgender promotion for youth becomes a core educational value– as justified by Charter Rights. In case readers are unaware, the founder of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is ex-Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau.

Let us be crystal clear: in no manner are we saying the doctrine of Christianity must be taught in our schools. This is not the point. When considering a 50-year educational journey, public education in Canada has travelled from Adam and Eve to “Adam and Steve.”

Liberal Party values thus revealed.  Looking at current Liberal Cabinet structure, we uncover Justin Trudeau’s kingpin of LGBT promotion.

Liberal MP Marci Ien holds a woke cabinet portfolio the Liberals call “Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Youth of Canada.” Last week, Ien made the following public statement regarding transgenderism for Canadian youth:

“Canada’s minister for women, gender equality and youth says policies in Saskatchewan and New Brunswick that require parental consent before students under 16 can have schools use their preferred pronouns and names puts transgender and nonbinary kids in a ‘life-or-death situation.“

Hysteria? Perhaps “panic” is a better word to describe Ms. Ien’s reaction. Parents are sick-and-tired of this issue. In fact, so are a fair number of members of Canada’s homosexual communities, embarrassed by the militancy displayed by Canada’s LGBT/Pride industry.

How did it come to be that transgenderism– a practice adopted by less than 1% of our population–- transitioned to a core Canadian value?

The voting public certainly didn’t ask for it. The movement just magically appeared, did it? Not quite. Under these circumstances, the only way in which “LGBT consciousness” could penetrate society on a mass scale is if giant money is backing it–- which, of course, it is.

Government money, of course– as funded by the Feds. Big money for Big Pharma in the form of hormone therapy drug manufacturing. Money for corporations– cosmetics, fashion, lingerie and such. Did you know? One of the major funders of LGBT in North America is a fellow named Leslie Wexner, owner of Victoria’s Secret. 

And his motivation is? Every element of this malarky has been omitted by another institutional LGBT promoter known as mainstream Canadian media.

No one is expecting the people of Canada to be a collective of puritans. But when children are targeted, the game gets serious. Why is it that government has usurped parental rights in the area of human sexuality? What kind of government butts their nose into the private parts of society in this manner?

Authoritarian governments. Is this what 40 million Canadians have on our hands under Canada’s post-modern LGBT-oriented government?

Transgenderism a “core value” of PM Trudeau and his Liberal government? If so, it’s a sad state of affairs. We stand witness as moral degeneracy comes to Canada in the form of so-called “Liberalism.”